![]() G)ğailed to have any regard to the presence and location of the third party vehicle on the highway and to yield the right of way to the said vehicle The Defendants their servants or agents or either of them were guilty of negligence and in breach of statutory duty in that they or either of them:Ĭ)ğailed to keep a proper or adequate lookout ĭ)Ĝollided with the said third party vehicle Į)ğailed to have any or any adequate regard for the prevailing road conditions į)ğailed to stop slow down swerve or in any other way so to manage the said vehicle so as to avoid the said collision in the City of Dublin, when owing to the negligence and breach of duty including breach of statutory duty of the Defendants their servants or agents or either of them in and about the driving, management, care, control and upkeep of a motor vehicle then being driven by the first Defendant and being the property of the second Defendant, same was caused or permitted to collide with a third party vehicle in consequence whereof the Plaintiff suffered severe personal injury and suffered loss damage and expense.ĥ. On or about the 1st December 2009 the Plaintiff was lawfully a passenger in a motor vehicle driven by the first Defendant on the public highway at Dame St. ![]() PARTICULARS OF CIRCUMSTANCES RELATING TO THE COMMISSION OF THE WRONGĤ. ģ.Ět all material times the first Defendant was the driver of a motor vehicle, the property of the second Defendant, in which the Plaintiff was traveling as a passenger and which collided with a third party vehicle causing severe personal injury loss and damage to the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff’s claim is for the reliefs recited herein for personal injuries suffered by the Plaintiff.Ģ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |